Back To Projects

Differences in predicted rates of vaginal births after cesarean across racial groups in a ‘race-neutral’ model

A large body of work in machine learning has highlighted that supposedly de-biased systems often re-code sensitive variables like race in terms of proxy variables. In order to determine if this was the case in this calculator, we replicated their formula, then found base-rate statistics of all the input variables for three different racial groups: Black, White, and Asian.


When physicians and pregnant patients make decisions about whether to pursue a vaginal birth or cesarean, there are many factors at play. While vaginal birth can have health benefits for both parent and child, there are significant safety risks. In order to minimize these risks, physicians use predictive models to determine how likely patients are to have successful vaginal births after cesareans (VBAC). For many years, these predictive models included race as a variable. This decision recently came under fire, and the Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit (MFMU) published a calculator that did not include race as a variable, but still predicted VBAC success with high accuracy. A large body of work in machine learning has highlighted that supposedly de-biased systems often re-code sensitive variables like race in terms of proxy variables. In order to determine if this was the case in this calculator, we replicated their formula, then found base-rate statistics of all the input variables for three different racial groups: Black, White, and Asian. We found that the distribution of VBAC probabilities for our simulated patients from these three groups were, indeed, significantly different from each other. Further, the predicted VBAC rates increased as a function of societal marginalization: Black patients were 47.6% likely to have a successful VBAC, Asian patients had a 48.6% probability, and White patients had a 49.4% probability. While these values are all within a few percentage points of each other, the differences in these simulated distributions shows how there may still be underlying disparities in the maternal healthcare system.

Explore More!

Published Paper
Anjali S.
Katie O'Nell
PhD Student at Dartmouth, Brain and Cognitive Sciences BS from MIT, Ethics+Social Sciences project and course developer at Inspirit AI

Related Projects

Developing an Accurate AI Algorithm for Histopathologic Cancer Detection

In this specific research project, we will be focusing on the lymph node scans of women with breast cancer, which is the most common cancer for women residing in the US, other than skin cancer. Research statistics show that about 1 in 8 women in the United States will develop invasive breast cancer throughout her life.
Leah N.
Mentored by Odysseas Drosis
Predicting Skin Cancer using Machine Learning

Skin cancer affects an increasing number of people which is the main motivation for my research. The goal is to develop a model that is accurate enough for real world application and that could be distributed to more rural areas which have decreased access to medical technology.
Keithan P.
Mentored by Eric Bradford
workspace_premium
Using Machine Learning to Detect Alzheimer’s Disease in MRI Scans

We aimed to answer the question about if Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, which are often used in the diagnosing of other neurological disorders, can be used to diagnose AD in patients.
Sam L.
Mentored by Ivan Villa-Renteria