Back To Projects

What Data is Needed to Accurately Determine Someone's Mental Health?

Claire L.

If we determine which data is actually necessary, we can build better user trust while maintaining the efficacy of a chatbot.


As the demand for mental healthcare increases, more people have turned to mental health chatbots and other AI-powered teletherapy options. While these chatbot applications expand access to care that is often expensive and stigmatized, they also pose some cybersecurity risks. Some chatbot applications use phone sensors and other device data to make predictions about the severity of a patient’s mental illness. While this makes these predictions more accurate, they might compromise user trust. In this paper, we are trying to find which data we should collect from the user’s phone to minimize the amount of data being collected but also collecting adequate information to predict their mental health score. This is important because users are not fully trusting the mobile apps since they are afraid the apps might track all of their personal information. If we determine which data is actually necessary, we can build better user trust while maintaining the efficacy of a chatbot. The overall approach was to first collect the data that was deemed useful, such as education, sensing, survey, and Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data, and then found how the accuracy of the scores would decrease when each category of data collected was removed to determine the most important category to collect, as well as what combination of categories yielded the highest accuracy. The most significant result was that when we didn’t include the data from the surveys, the accuracy went down significantly. The major conclusions are that not every detail from a user’s phone will need to be collected in order to yield accurate results, and in fact, simply asking users about their daily experiences allows for far more accurate results than on-device measures.

Explore More!

Claire L.
Katie O'Nell
PhD Student at Dartmouth, Brain and Cognitive Sciences BS from MIT, Ethics+Social Sciences project and course developer at Inspirit AI

Related Projects

workspace_premium
Evaluating the Efficacy of the 3D U-Net Architecture For Glioblastoma Multiforme Tumor Segmentation

This research evaluates the performance of the 3D U-Net model for automated glioblastoma tumor segmentation from MRIs, achieving 98.6% accuracy and significantly faster processing times than human oncologists, crucial for effective radiation therapy.
Arnav J.
Mentored by Erick Siavichay
workspace_premium
Impact of Class Weights and Feature Importance in Automated Stroke Detection

In this research paper, we do a parametric study of class weighting as a way to tackle imbalance during training. We then infer the most important features that should be taken into consideration for stroke prediction.
Avyukth H.
Mentored by
workspace_premium
A Novel Approach to Promote Equity in Skin Disease Diagnosis by AI Models

The goal is to increase the accuracy of existing models in diagnosing skin disease across various skin tones within 10% of that obtained in diagnosing fairer skin tones, which is about 95.8%.
Varsha N.
Mentored by Roger Jin